Legal Opinion

Middlebrook v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1991No. 2-89-307-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

Gary Charles Middlebrook appeals his conviction for the offense of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. See TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. sec. 31.07 (Vernon 1989).

We affirm.

Middlebrook's second point of error alleges that the trial court erred in overruling his challenge for cause of a venireman and in denying his request for an extra peremptory strike due to the trial court’s alleged erroneous overruling of the challenge for cause.

Rulings on a challenge for cause to a prospective juror are the functions of the trial court, and when bias or prejudice is not established as a matter…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Beardsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Dues v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Denton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Thompson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Commonwealth v. SolomonsenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Craig Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
  5. Eloy Earl Ogaz, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API