Legal Opinion

Fleckenstein v. Franklin National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William R. Brennan, Jr., J.

This is a motion by the defendants the Franklin National Bank of Long Island and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation to dismiss the complaint upon the grounds (1) that “ the allegations in the complaint have been the subject of judgment * * * on the merits between the parties or their privies ” (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 4), and (2) that the Statute of Limitations has expired (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 5).

*1033The motion is denied as to the first ground and granted as to the second.

The complaint and affidavits present an interesting and involved…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pierpoint v. HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Mack v. MendelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Levy v. . NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Guild v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NewburgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. D'Aprile v. BlytheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Devine v. Rayette-Faberge, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API