Flowers v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOEHLER, Justice.
A jury convicted Dearl Flowers, Appellant, of second degree felony theft and assessed punishment at 4 years’ imprisonment. After we reversed the conviction, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the State’s amendments to the charging instrument, over objection by Appellant, did not violate Tex.Code Crim.Pro.Ann. art. 28.10 (Vernon 1989). Flowers v. State, 815 S.W.2d 724 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). As a result, the case was remanded to this Court to consider Appellant’s remaining points of error.
Within this opinion, we will discuss only Point of Error No. Seven in which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Stoker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Juarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Flowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Allen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Coffin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993