Legal Opinion

Waksman v. Walker

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided February 9, 1968No. 3700PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ullman, J.,

Plaintiff in this trespass action has propounded two interrogatories as to whether defendant is insured and as to the limits of coverage. Inquiry is made as to whether defendant is “insured by any public liability insurance applicable to this accident”. Defendant objected to the interrogatories, on the ground that the information is *2irrelevant to plaintiff’s cause of .action, and on the ground that the information is sought in violation of the provisions of Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4011 (a), (c) and (d).

There are no pertinent factual disputes before us and the parties…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. People Ex Rel. Terry v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. James Kiernan and Mary Kiernan v. Gerald Van Schaik, T/a Van's Atlantic StationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  4. Brooks v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Maddox v. GraumanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Szarmack v. WelchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API