Legal Opinion
Teamsters Local Union No. 1111 v. Wilkins
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 3, 1988No. 09-87-197 CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
Joe Wilkins was a truck driver and a member of Teamsters Local Union No. 1111 (the Union). Wilkins was employed by Tandum Truck Service (Tandum) which was a signatory to a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with the Union. In August 1982, Tandum instituted a new rule that all employees sign affidavits of no liens or debt to satisfy a requirement of its contractor, CER, Inc. Wilkins signed several of the affidavits under protest until he could confer with the Union. The Union advised Wilkins not to sign the affidavits because the requirement was unilaterally imposed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.