Dorn v. Baker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
— This is an action of ejectment, to recover possession of the east half of a certain thirty-sixth section of land in San Luis Obispo County, and the complaint is in the ordinary form. The answer of defendants simply denies the averments of the complaint, and alleges that the cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations.
At the trial, the plaintiff introduced in evidence a patent from the state of California, dated March 21, 1891, granting to him the demanded premises. The defendants then admitted that they were, and had been since January 1, 1891, in possession of said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Kentfield v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Manly v. HowlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Hartley v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by10 opinions
- Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Helvey v. SaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Parham & Co. v. Potts-Thompson Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Bank of Woodland v. HeronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Olds v. Little Horse Creek Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.