Legal Opinion

King v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 2010No. 2008-SC-000274-DGPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice SCHRODER.

At issue in this case is whether exigent circumstances existed, which justified the warrantless entry of the apartment occupied by Appellant Hollis Deshaun King. We hold that police were not in hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect, and that, with regard to the imminent destruction of evidence, any exigency was police-created. We also note that no “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule applies in this case. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

I. BACKGROUND

On the evening of October 13, 2005, Lexington-Fayette County police were…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Peacher v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Chavies v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  4. United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. King v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API