Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Napoli

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 8, 2001No. 2D00-853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a costs judgment entered in a case dismissed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.260(a)(1). The plaintiff, Lana Campbell, died, and her counsel was unable to substitute a successor party as required by rule 1.260(a)(1). The trial court dismissed the action without prejudice and retained jurisdiction to assess costs. The proceeding to tax costs and the judgment for costs both occurred after Lana Campbell’s death and without the substitution of a successor party.

Lana Campbell, as the plaintiff, was an indispensable party to the action.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Becker v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Cope v. WaughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Floyd v. WallaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schaeffler v. DeychDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. King Tyson, Inc. v. Marta Soto Perez, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API