Legal Opinion
Floyd v. Wallace
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 18, 1976No. 48901PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUNDBERG, Justice.
This case is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, First District. We entered our order allowing certiorari and dispensing with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10e, F.A.R. Our jurisdiction vests under Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, because of conflict between the District Court’s decision, reported at 324 So.2d 723, and Izlar v. Slyke, 94 Fla. 1218, 115 So. 516 (1928) and Hull v. Burr, 62 Fla. 499, 56 So. 673 (1911).
On June 14, 1974, respondent Wallace filed suit to rescind and cancel a quitclaim deed and to have a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hull v. BurrSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Izler v. Porter SlykeSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schaeffler v. DeychDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Cope v. WaughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Edward Wallace v. Tina KeldieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Campbell v. NapoliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- SANDRA MATTICK v. ERNIE C. LISCH AS ATTORNEY AD LITEM FOR THE ESTATE OF ERNIE CONRADSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.