Legal Opinion
Armen Manukian v. Procida Construction Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 5, 2025No. 1:23-cv-10249Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARMEN MANUKIAN, Plaintiff, . OPINION. & ORDER — against — 23 Civ. 10249 (ER) PROCIDA CONSTRUCTION CORP. NEW YORK, Defendant. Ramos, D.J.: Armen Manukian (“Manukian’”), proceeding pro se, brought this action against Procida Construction Corp. (“Procida”),! alleging claims of unpaid wages and discrimination. Doc. 2. Before the Court is Procida’s motion for summary judgment dismissing all of Manukian’s claims with prejudice. Doc. 23. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND? A. Factual Background Manukian was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.