Dickison v. Ogden's Ex'r
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 25 — APPEAL PROM ■WARREN CIRCUIT COURT. The children of Mary Jane Dickison did not acquire such an interest under the will of Thomas Rogers as can be subjected to the payment, of their debts. The children of Mary Jane Dickison took a contingent interest under-the will of Thomas Rogers, which may be subjected to the payment of their debts. (Gen. Stats., sec. 1, p. 426.)
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PRYOR
delivered the opinion of ti-ie court.
The will of Thomas Rogers is before us for construction. After making various devises, the testator gives all the rest and residue of Ms estate to three trustees, to bé held by them for the benefit of Ms daughter, Mary Jane Dickison, and her children, with the power to the trustees or the survivor to sell and reinvest the proceeds in other property with the consent of his daughter, &c. The trustees “ shall suffer- *163and permit my said daughter to hold possession and enjoy the said property, and to take and receive the yearly rents and profits…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Harvey v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Spacey v. CloseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Schneider v. HolzhauerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Smith v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Keith v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.