Legal Opinion
Rye v. Banks
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 9, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Writ of error to Circuit Court, Suwannee County; R. T. Boozer, Judge Ad Litem.
1Per curiam 1
It appearing that this writ of error was ’ sued out and entered on the fifth day of June, 1913, and was made returnable on the sixth day of September, 1913, more than ninety days from the date of the writ, in violation of Chapter 5638 of the Laws of 1907, if follows that it must be dismissed. Ates v. Langley, 63. Fla. 504.
Writ of error dismissed.
All concur.
On Motion to Reinstate.
2Per curiam 2
The writ of error herein was dismissed because it bears date June 5, 1913, and was made returnable September 6, 1913, “more than ninety days from the date of the writ” in violation of the statute. A motion is made to…
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lamb v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HartleySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Rood v. Miami Air Conditioning Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Adams v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. PowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1925