City of Pacific v. Metro Development Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PUDLOWSKI, Judge.
This appeal concerns.the City of Pacific’s efforts to expand its municipal girth via the involuntary annexation procedures of RSMo § 71.015. Edwin and Caroline Upchurch, appellants herein, reside in an unincorporated section of Franklin County which lies within the area respondent Pacific originally sought to annex. However, appellants’ property was removed from the ambit of the annexation on the day of trial when respondent dismissed appellants from the ease. The trial court accepted appellants’ dismissal and, after respondent’s brief presentation of evidence, declared a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Metro Auto Auction v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Washington University v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- MAYOR, COUNCILMEN, & CITIZENS ETC. v. BeardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- City of Kingsport v. State Ex Rel. Crown Enterprises, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Temple Stephens Co. v. WestenhaverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Manchester v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- City of Rolla v. ArmalyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Peculiar v. Effertz Bros Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Mayberry v. City of RollaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bitting v. Central Pointe Condominium Board of ManagersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.