Legal Opinion

Salazar v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 25, 1989No. A14-87-979-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

This case arises out of appellant Arturo Salazar’s misdemeanor conviction for the offense of driving while intoxicated [“DWI”]. The trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress and found him guilty on his plea of nolo contendere and sentenced him to 40 days’ confinement in the Harris County Jail and a $500 fine. Appellant appeals the denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress. We affirm.

We first address the State’s contention that we lack jurisdiction. Former Tex. Code CRIM.PROC.Ann. art. 44.02 (Vernon 1979) limited the right of the accused to appeal a plea…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. McQuillen v. Wisconsin Education Ass'n CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Christal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Delatorre v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  3. Berrios-Torres v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Lynch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API