Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Gildred

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 25, 2025No. 3:23-cv-02105Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MAYER AMSCHEL ROTHSCHILD, Case No. 23-cv-02105-LJC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 STEPHANIE ANN GILDRED, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 59 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court is Defendants Stephanie Gildred and Lorton Management Corporation’s 13 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s Second Amended Complaint. Having 14 considered the papers submitted by the parties and the oral arguments presented, for the reasons 15 discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is granted and Plaintiff’s Second…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API