Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1895No. 19516PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an action to quiet the title of plaintiff to a parcel of land lying and being in the city of Los Angeles, bounded and described as follows:

“ Commencing at a granite stone monument set at the intersection of the produced center line of Rouland street and the western boundary of the city of Los Angeles, said center line being the present northern boundary of said Rouland street in the Wiesendanger city tract, and running thence along said west city boundary N. 0° 26' W. 37.72 feet to a stake in the southwest corner of the John Jones property; thence along a board fence S. 61°…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Werner v. BrydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API