Dorsey v. Barba
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTraynor, J.
For the reasons stated in the majority opinion, I agree that the judgment in favor of Catherine Barba should be reversed. I dissent, however, from the holding that the courts of this state do not have the power of additur.1
I
It is incongruous that plaintiffs should base their appeal upon the ground that they have been denied a constitutional right to jury trial. Although they had a jury trial, they do not want a judgment entered on the jury verdict. They attack that verdict and ask the court to rescue them from it by granting a new trial before another jury. The right to a jury trial, however,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Cassell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.