Legal Opinion

Escoett & Co. v. Alexander & Alexander, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1969PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered on October 15, 1968, insofar as it denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the defendant’s counterclaim, unanimously reversed on the law and motion granted, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant. The counterclaim, insofar as it purports to be grounded in libel or slander, is legally insufficient, as it fails to set forth the particular words complained of. (CPLR 3016; Brandt v. Winchell, 3 N Y 2d 628, 636.) Nor can the counterclaim foe sustained as .pleading a cause of action in fraud since none of the traditional elements of such an action is alleged. Defendant…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kelly v. L.L. Cool J.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Falise v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  4. Shaw v. Rolex Watch, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. City of New York v. Cyco. Net, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API