Legal Opinion

Poppenberg v. . R.M. Owen and Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 19,1914, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict. This action was brought to recover upon certain written contracts in and by the terms of which the plaintiff was given the exclusive right to sell certain motor cars known as the Reo cars of various styles within a portion of the state of New York.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 19,1914, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict. This action was brought to recover upon certain written contracts in and by the terms of which the plaintiff was given the exclusive right to sell certain motor cars known as the Reo cars of various styles within a portion of the state of New York. The defendant claimed damages by way of counterclaim for failure on the part of the plaintiff to take all of the cars alleged to have been purchased in…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nederlandse Draadindustrie NDI B v. v. Grand Pre-Stressed Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  2. Bourjois, Inc. v. McGowanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
  3. Breding v. Champlain Marine & Realty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  4. Young v. Curtiss Aeroplane Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. Genovese v. A. Lenobel, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API