State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DIETZ, Judge.
*197 Defendant Marvin Miller appeals his conviction for killing his estranged wife and severely wounding her boyfriend. He argues that the State violated his Confrontation Clause rights at trial when a law enforcement officer described to the jury what Miller's wife told him during an earlier domestic abuse investigation.
As explained below, we agree that the State violated Miller's Confrontation Clause rights. The victim's statements to the officer in that earlier domestic violence incident were made after she fled from Miller in her car and called police from a safe location.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- United States v. Antwan JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018