Legal Opinion

State v. Ramos

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 22, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

203 N.J. Super. 197 (1985)

496 A.2d 386

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ANGEL RAMOS, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Criminal, Union County.

Decided April 22, 1985.

Harold C. Knox, Assistant Prosecutor for State (John H. Stamler, Pros., Union County).

Robert T. Norton, for Defendant (Norton and DeRose, attorney).

MENZA, J.S.C.

The question presented in this case is whether various statements made by an infant victim of a sexual assault to her mother after the occurrences of the alleged assaults are admissible as either fresh complaints, spontaneous utterances, or both.

The facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keefe v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lieberman v. SaleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. State v. BicanichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. State v. BicanichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. State v. CherryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MurrayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. J.S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. Truchan v. Sayreville BarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. State v. RamosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. State v. BethuneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API