Legal Opinion
State v. Bicanich
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 26, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 132 N. J. Super. 393.
For affirmance- — -Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford and Judge Conford — 7.
For reversal — None.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. BicanichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- State v. RamosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- State v. GrossmickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010