Legal Opinion
In re the Rehabilitation of Empire Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 9, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sullivan, J.
Claimant Armando Barone appeals from an order confirming the referee’s report and denying and dismissing his first-party benefits claim against Empire Mutual Insurance Company, which is in rehabilitation pursuant to article 16 of the Insurance Law.
The facts are not in dispute. Mr. Barone, an independent contractor making a masonry repair, was injured on April 10,1978 on the premises of Elan’s Service Station when he was struck by a vehicle owned by Nick Hambas. The Hambas vehicle, which had been delivered to the station the night before for repairs, was being…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of Picone v. Comr. of LicensesNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Farber v. SmolackNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Mount v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. WoodburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- People Ex Rel. L. N.Y.R.R. Co. v. . SohmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Buck v. Graphic Arts Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Hashemi v. Solow Management Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- McKernan v. City of New York Civil Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Mazgulski v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Lang v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983