Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Butz

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 30, 1973No. 72-1626PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

SWEIGERT, District Judge.

In this suit by twenty-five individual plaintiffs against the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior, the amended complaint alleges in substance and effect that plaintiffs are members of an unorganized band of Karuk Indians without any governing body recognized by the Secretary of the Interior; that the Karuks had once occupied certain lands in what is now northeastern Humboldt and southwestern Siskiyou Counties, part of the Klamath River watershed, now administered by the Secretary of the Interior as the Klamath National Forest and the Six…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Schilling v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. White v. CalifanoDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1977
  2. Mitchell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. United States v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Jeno's Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents & TrademarksDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
  5. Karuk Tribe of California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API