Legal Opinion

Tarkington v. Rock Hill Printing & Finishing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, C. J.

We have here for consideration, (1) the ruling on the plea in bar of the alleged joint tort-feasor, (2) the competency of evidence, (3) the argument of counsel to the jury, and (4) the correctness and adequacy of the charge.

1. The Plea in Bar of Alleged Joint Tort-feasor: The corporate defendant and the driver of its truck, by plea, cross-action and motion in each case, had the driver of the automobile in which the plaintiffs were riding, brought in as an alleged joint tort-feasor, for the purpose of enforcing contribution of his proportionate part of any recovery which the plaintiffs might…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Hodges v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Brewington v. LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hodges v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Yellow Cab Co. Of D. C., Inc. v. JansonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  3. Queen City Coach Company v. BurrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Brewington v. . LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Green v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API