Tarkington v. Rock Hill Printing & Finishing Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStagy, C. J.
We have here for consideration, (1) the ruling on the plea in bar of the alleged joint tort-feasor, (2) the competency of evidence, (3) the argument of counsel to the jury, and (4) the correctness and adequacy of the charge.
1. The Plea in Bar of Alleged Joint Tort-feasor: The corporate defendant and the driver of its truck, by plea, cross-action and motion in each case, had the driver of the automobile in which the plaintiffs were riding, brought in as an alleged joint tort-feasor, for the purpose of enforcing contribution of his proportionate part of any recovery which the plaintiffs might…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Hodges v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Brewington v. LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hodges v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Yellow Cab Co. Of D. C., Inc. v. JansonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Queen City Coach Company v. BurrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Brewington v. . LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Green v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.