Legal Opinion
Hackel v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 21, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-10031-EFHPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARRINGTON, District Judge.
This is a civil action, tried to the Court sitting without a jury, in which the Plain-tiffyDefendant-in-Counterclaim, Allan R. Hackel (“Hackel”), seeks a Court Declaration that he is not obligated to perform under a certain note and guaranty due to the alleged breach of a related commercial lease by the Defendant/Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). In response, the FDIC counterclaims for breach of the note and the guaranty.
In August of 1986, Capitol Bank and Trust Company (“Bank”), a Massachusetts banking…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baumann v. Savers Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Julio S. LaguartaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Margret Rey v. Richard G.D. Lafferty, Margret Rey v. Richard G.D. LaffertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Texas Commerce Bank National Association v. Capital Bancshares, Inc., Texas Commerce Bank National Association v. Capital Bancshares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Holmes Realty Trust v. Granite City Storage Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. S.A.S. AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- In Re Miraj and Sons, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- WRH Mortgage, Inc. v. S.A.S. AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Wrh Mortgage, Incorporated v. S.A.S. AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Hyaire v. FDICDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995