George Bolln Co. v. North Platte Valley Irrigation Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Reserved Questions from District Court, Converse County; Hon. Charles E. Carpenter, Judge. The reserved questions are. stated in the opinion. The general propositions involved in the question as- to the legislative procedure in the passage of the act referred to in the reserved questions were fully considered by this court in Hynds v. Cahill, 12 Wyo. 225, and State v. Swan, 7 Wyo. 166, and that phase of the case is submitted on the part of the plaintiff without argument.
Read the full summary
Reserved Questions from District Court, Converse County; Hon. Charles E. Carpenter, Judge. The reserved questions are. stated in the opinion. The general propositions involved in the question as- to the legislative procedure in the passage of the act referred to in the reserved questions were fully considered by this court in Hynds v. Cahill, 12 Wyo. 225, and State v. Swan, 7 Wyo. 166, and that phase of the case is submitted on the part of the plaintiff without argument. The novelty of the statute does hot necessarily militate against its validity:It is a matter of legislative policy to…
1Opinion of the Court
Beard’, Chiee Justice.
This case comes to this court on questions reserved by the district court of Converse county and certified here for .decisión as to the constitutionality of Chapter 78 of the Session Raws, 1909, entitled: “An act to protect laborers, mechanics, ranchmen, farmers, merchants and other persons furnishing work or labor, material, ranch or farm products, goods or provisions, to contractors or sub-contractors in the construction of ditches, canals and reservoirs;” and now being Sections 3823, 3824 and 3825, Comp. Stat. 1910. The reserved questions being as follows':
‘T. In the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Jones v. Great Southern Fireproof Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Gibbs v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Hynds v. CahillWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Italia America Shipping Corp. v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Holman v. PabstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners v. WrightWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.