Legal Opinion

Bingaman v. Dahm

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 28, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Culbertson

This is an appeal from a decree of foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, decreeing that defendants, Alfred E. Dahm, etc., James H. Bipley, and Barbara Bipley, pay to plaintiff William (Bill) Bingaman, the sum of $559.93, and to plaintiff Martin W. Busekrus, doing business as Da-Mte Garage & Filling Station, the sum of $145.15, together with interest at the rate of 5 per cent from the date of the decree, and providing in the usual form for the sale of certain premises of the said James H. Bipley and Barbara Bipley, in the event of the failure to make such payments.

The evidence disclosed that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dobschuetz v. HollidayIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Granquist v. Western Tube Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Cross v. Weare Commission Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Crescio v. CrescioIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Owings v. EstesIllinois Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. B. Kreisman & Co. v. First Arlington National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Atlee Electric Co. v. Johnson Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Anderson v. GoussetAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Malkov Lumber Co. v. Serafine Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Mutschler Kitchens of Chicago, Inc. v. WinemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API