Legal Opinion

Susa v. Consolidated Ice Company

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1933No. Appeal, 75PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

A brief examination of the record before us is sufficient to show that judgment non obstante veredicto was correctly entered by the court below, plaintiff clearly being guilty of contributory negligence.

Plaintiff, on a motorcycle with sidecar, following one Neubauer, also on a motorcycle, was traveling along Foster Street in the City of Pittsburgh. As he came to the intersection of Foster with 42d Street (both streets being 20 feet wide), he looked to his right and saw defendant’s truck approaching from that direction, about 70 or 80 feet from the intersection. He was unable to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Campagna v. LylesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Schneider v. American Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toyer v. HillemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Clark v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API