Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bi-County Development of Clinton, Inc. v. Borough of High Bridge

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 5, 2002Published

1DissentVerniero, J.

The Court holds that Bi-County, a developer that has agreed to pay up to $374,000 toward the construction of low- and moderate-income housing units, cannot connect to High Bridge’s sewer line. In so doing, it forces Bi-County to spend in excess of $600,000 on *329an alternative sewer connection without any determination concerning whether the connection to High Bridge’s sewer system would place a burden on that system or on the municipality’s taxpayers. More significant than requiring the needless expenditure of funds by this one developer, the Court’s holding limits a municipality’s flexibility…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Holmdel Builders Ass'n v. Township of HolmdelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Mongiello v. Borough of HightstownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. Samaritan Center v. Borough of EnglishtownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API