Legal Opinion

Mark v. Moser

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 2001No. 29A02-0010-CV-623PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge

Today we are called upon to clearly define the standard of care one competitor owes another in a sporting event. Although this court may have tangentially addressed the issue in the past, there has been no case since the adoption of the Comparative Fault Act where an in-depth analysis was warranted. Thus, the precise issue we must decide is whether a participant in an athletic activity may recover in tort for injury as the result of another participant's negligent conduct.

FACTS

The uncontroverted facts are that on September 7, 1997, Rebecca Mark (Rebecca) and Kyle Moser…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Marchetti v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. USA Life One Insurance v. NuckollsIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Karas v. StrevellIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Moser v. RatinoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Wallace v. RosenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Bowman Ex Rel. Bowman v. McNaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API