Legal Opinion

In re DiPippo

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 2, 2000No. 2000-12-M.PPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This disciplinary case is before the Court pursuant to a recommendation of the Supreme Court Disciplinary Board (board) that Robert F. DiPippo (respondent) be suspended from the practice of law for three years. Article III, Rule 6(d) of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure provides in pertinent part:

“If the Board determines that a proceeding * * * should be concluded by public censure, suspension or disbarment, it shall submit its findings and recommendations, together with the entire record, to this Court. This Court shah review the record and enter an appropriate order.”

T…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of KrauseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Matter of DiPippoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. In Re RicciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Matter of HodgeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re DiPippoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  2. In re VeigaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API