Legal Opinion

Commercial Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Carlson, Ins. Comm.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1943No. 6536Published

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, Justice.

In 1941 the plaintiff insurance company presented to defendant drafts of a proposed policy of insurance to be solicited and issued in the State of Utah, known as the “Dual-Pay” policy, requesting permit to sell and issue such form of policy in this state. The Insurance Commissioner denied the request by a written notice to the company. The plaintiff thereupon commenced an action in the district court to obtain a judgment to set aside the ruling of the Commissioner, to authorize plaintiff company to issue such proposed form of policy in this state, and to restrain the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Uhlman v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Pierce v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. United States Life Ins. v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  4. Colgrove v. LoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Knott v. State Ex Rel. Guaranty Income Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API