Legal Opinion

M

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1961No. 1123Published

1Opinion of the Court

In DEPORTATION Proceedings .r.utt OF M— A-4511502 Decided by Board February 10,1967 Deportability—Section 241(a)(11), 1952 act—Conviction for growing opium poppy without license. Conviction under the Opium Poppy Control Act of 1942, 21 U.S.C. 188-188n, for growing opium poppies without a license, constitutes a violation of a s tatute governing or controlling the production of opium within the purview of section 241(a) (11) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. CHARGES : Warrant: Act of 1924—Ineligible to citizenship at time of entry. Lodged : Act of 1924—No immigration visa. Act of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Az Din v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Richard C. Hoy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, Los Angeles, California v. Manuel Mendoza-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Stutz v. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, ETC.District Court, N.D. California · 1944
  5. Richard C. Hoy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, Los Angeles, California v. Arnulfo Rojas-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API