Legal Opinion

Stutz v. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, ETC.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 28, 1944No. 4926, 4938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

These are companion cases, involving the same issues and heard together upon the plaintiffs’ applications for preliminary injunction and the defendants’ motions to. dismiss.

The plaintiffs are growers within the State of California of the blue seeded poppy of the species known botanically as Papaver Somniferum. They are cultivating these poppies for their seed, an edible food product commercially profitable to the producer. Other parts of this species of poppy are a source of opium and opium derivatives, including morphine. The fluid obtained through incisions cut in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Neely v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. DePughDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1967
  3. Constitutionality of Legislation to Establish a Program to Prevent Aircraft Piracy, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1973
  4. MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1961
  5. Weeks v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API