Legal Opinion

Slobodnjak v. Coyne

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 18, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries suffered by being thrown from an automobile in which he was riding as the guest of the defendant. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed from the denial of his motion to set that verdict aside. As the accident happened in Massachusetts, the law of that State governs as far as the substantive elements necessary to a recovery are concerned. James v. Von Schuckman, 115 Conn. 490, 493, 162 Atl. 3. By that law, in the absence of a claim of wanton or reckless misconduct, a guest in an automobile…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Manning v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Isaacson v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Learned v. HawthorneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Wood v. WatkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ziulkowski v. KolodziejSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Ryan v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Gondek v. PliskaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  4. McKnight v. Red Cab Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Curtis v. CurtisIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API