Legal Opinion

State v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 1, 1992No. 91-242PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendant, Kevin Wilkinson, was found guilty by a jury (O’Neil, J.) of violating RSA 264:25, conduct after an accident. On appeal, he contends that the search of the car involved in the.accident was unlawful because the affidavit underlying the search warrant had insufficient indicia of reliability and contained material misrepresentations. Further, he argues that his wife was allowed to testify at his trial in contravention of the marital privilege. We affirm.

On May 29, 1989, at about 11:30 at night, a man was severely injured in a hit-and-run accident in front of the Meredith Station…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Albert M. LefkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. State v. ValenzuelaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. State v. McAdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. State v. SperoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PelletierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. Bell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. Weedon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API