Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Wilson v. Lynch & Lynch Co., L.P.A.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 27, 1994No. Nos. 93-G-1804, 93-G-1814Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFord, Presiding Judge
The decision reached by the majority further erodes upon the rights of lawyers, causing them to be:
“[T]he only persons in this state who are prohibited from enforcing written contracts according to their express terms and conditions when such contracts involve payment for services and a dispute, regardless of cause or merit, arises over representation.” Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v. Lansberry (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 570, 577-578, 629 N.E.2d 431, 437 (Douglas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I, too, believe that “even those who are most critical of lawyers and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Jimmie Wilmington v. J.I. Case Company, Jimmie Wilmington v. J.I. Case CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v. LansberryOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Gugle v. LoeserOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Waterman v. KitrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.