Legal Opinion

Beauregard v. Webb Granite & Construction Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

The presiding justice compelled the plaintiff, at the close of the evidence, “ to elect upon which count she would go to the jury.” The declaration contains two counts, each under St. 1887, c. 270. The action is by a widow for the death of her husband, Clement Beauregard, who, it is alleged, was in the exercise of due care, and died without conscious suffering while in the employment of the defendant. The first count is plainly intended as a count under § 1, cl. 1, of the statute, and the second count is under clause 2 of the same section. The evidence, so far as it is recited in the report,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canterbury v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Drommie v. HoganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coughlan v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. FirstbrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. Williams v. Pittsfield Lime & Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Clare v. New York & New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Columb v. Webster Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API