Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1986No. CX-85-719Published

1Opinion of the Court

377 N.W.2d 62 (1985)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

James A. FORD, Appellant.

No. CX-85-719.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 19, 1985.

Review Granted January 31, 1986.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, R. Kathleen Morris, Scott Co. Atty., Mary Yunker, Asst. Co. Atty., Shakopee, for respondent.

Phillip Gainsley, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered, and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and RANDALL and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant, James A. Ford, appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss the charges, from a judgment of conviction entered on April 10,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. State v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. State v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API