Legal Opinion

Potter v. Robison

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1909No. 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original application to the Supreme Court by Martha M. Potter and others for writ of mandamus against the Commissioner of the General Land Office, W. L. Foxworth, an adverse claimant of the land, being made co-respondent.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

Martha M. Potter, surviving wife of John B. Potter, deceased, Henry Potter, Wallace Potter, Edward Potter and Cora Davis, children of the said Martha M. Potter and John B. Potter, and A. D. Davis, the husband of the said Cora Davis, instituted this proceeding in this court to secure a mandamus for the purpose and upon the facts hereinafter stated. J. T. Robison, having been elected Commissioner of the Land Office since the institution of the proceeding, made himself a party hereto and W. L. Foxworth was made a party as co-respondent with the said Commissioner.

The facts, briefly stated, are as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of Galveston v. GorhamTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. City of Quanah v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Campbell, Receiver v. Wiggins, Tax CollectorTexas Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Erp v. TillmanTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Galveston & W. Ry Co. v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Baldwin v. SalgadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Board of Adjustment v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API