Legal Opinion
Froehlich v. K. W. W. Holding Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
The seller under a contract for the sale of real property seeks specific performance of it. It is conceded that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought unless the housing legislation passed in September last (Laws of 1920, chaps. 942-953) makes it inequitable to so decree. The property affected is an apartment house located in the borough of Brooklyn and contains sixteen or seventeen apartments. The contract was dated March 15, 1920, and by its terms was to close July 15, 1920. The contract contained the provision “ subject to the rights of present tenants by lease or otherwise, no…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- People v. Globe Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Industrial Development Foundation of Auburn, New York, Inc. v. United States Hoffman Machinery Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Latipac Corp. v. BMH Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Froelich v. K. W. W. Holding Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Goodman v. SubotnickNew York Supreme Court · 1922
- Parlato v. BonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976