CRH Americas Incorporated v. Grayson

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 CRH Americas Incorporated, No. CV-20-00007-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Andrew Grayson, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Although the complaint alleges that the plaintiff in this action is the administrator 16 of an employee benefit plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 17 (“ERISA”), the claims do not “arise from the administration” of the Plan, either “directly 18 or indirectly.” Gibson v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.,

915 F.2d 414, 416

(9th Cir. 1990); 19 see also Bui v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co.…