Legal Opinion

Puglisi v. Hansford

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1990No. 4-89-0345PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

This is an interlocutory appeal (107 Ill. 2d R. 308) from a trial court order vacating a default judgment on its own motion and setting the cause for a jury trial. Three questions have been certified for interlocutory appeal. They are:

“(a) Do the provisions of the Constitution of the United States, Amendments] VII and XIV, and the provisions of the Constitution of the State of Illinois 1970, Article I, Section 13, prevent the entry of the default judgment against a litigant who makes a timely jury demand but otherwise fails to appear personally or by her legal representative when notice by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walker v. SauvinetSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. BrochuIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Flores v. DuganIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Barreto v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Sexton v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RymutAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. EarlesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Schultz v. Sinav Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024
  4. Schultz v. Sinav Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024
  5. People v. ArmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API