Legal Opinion

Trigg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 15, 1924No. 7948Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Complaint is made that we did not discuss an alleged error in overruling the motion for new trial, one ground of which was purported newly .discovered evidence from a witness by the name of Jesse Wade.

Within thirty' minutes after the verdict of guilty was returned attorneys for appellant were in consultation with this witness, and within an hour had an affidavit from him which was attached to the motion for new trial. The facts set up in this affidavit comport with the defensive testimony. As soon as attorneys representing the state heard of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dozier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API