Legal Opinion

Freels v. Walker

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1931No. Motion Nos. 9122, 9123, 9125; 1170-5488PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddx, J.

The motion for rehearing in this case is supported by elaborate and able arguments filed by the various respondents.

All of these arguments vigorously urge the proposition that Bowen, by filing his application for a mineral permit in the office of the county clerk, thereby acquired a right to take the necessary steps to obtain a mineral permit which was superior to that of any other person subsequently filing an application for a permit on the same land. From this premise, the correctness of which must of course be conceded, it is argued that, as the right thus acquired»was superior to that of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cargill & Dennis v. Kountze Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gulf Production Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Cruzan v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Country Club v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Country Club v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Texas v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Allen v. Mauro, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986
  3. McInnis v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. McInnis v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Regan v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API