Legal Opinion

Com. v. Hilliard

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 9, 2005No. Record 042204PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEENAN, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that a defendant's motion to suppress an incriminating statement should have been granted because he made the statement in response to police questioning conducted after he invoked his right to counsel.

Curtis Darnell Hilliard was tried in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond on charges of murder, in violation of Code § 18.2-32; use of a firearm in the commission of murder, in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1; maliciously shooting into an occupied vehicle, in violation of Code § 18.2-154; and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. EfflerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Zektaw v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  3. Ferguson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  4. Jamie Aaron Kuhne v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  5. Secret v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API