Legal Opinion

United States v. Samuel Andrew Lindstrom, Jr., United States of America v. Samuel Andrew Lindstrom, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 27, 1955No. 11509_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

The defendants, Samuel Andrew Lind-strom, Senior, and Samuel Andrew Lind-strom, Junior, were found guilty by a jury in the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania of wilfully and knowingly attempting to defeat and evade income tax -for the years 1947, 1949 and 1950 in violation of section 145 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 145(b). They both moved for judgments of acquittal in the District Court which were denied. Each has appealed to this court asserting that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s finding of wilful…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. LindstromDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Harry J. Alker, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. Marvin Sherwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. Merle D. LongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  4. United States v. PawlakDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  5. United States v. CindrichDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API