Legal Opinion
Mukamal v. BMO Harris Bank N.A. ex rel. Merger to M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (In re Palm Beach Finance Partners, L.P.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
Decided November 4, 2013No. CASE NO.: 09-36379-BKC-PGH; ADV. NO.: 11-03015-BKC-PGH-APublished
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPTER 11
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND (ECF NO. 140)
Paul G. Hyman, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court
THIS MATTER came before the Court for hearing upon the Motion to Strike Jury Demand (the “Motion to Strike”) (ECF No. 140) filed by BMO Harris Bank N.A. as Successor by Merger to M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (the “Defendant”). The Motion to Strike seeks an order striking the Jury Demand (ECF No. 109) filed by Barry Mukamal (the “Plaintiff’) in his capacity as Liquidating Trustee for the Palm Beach Finance Liquidating Trust and the Palm Beach Finance II…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Langenkamp v. CulpSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.