Legal Opinion

Howe v. Woolsey

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by William F. Howe and another against Edward J. Wool■sey. From a judgment of the city court (25 27. Y. Supp. 1145) affirming a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiffs, défendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $500 for legal services rendered to the defendant in various suits between April 12, 1892, and the 20th day of March, 1893. There is a statement in' the appeal book that the case contains all the evidence taken on the trial; and that it does not is clear from the fact that it shows two exhibits, I and J, were received in evidence, which are not printed therein. It has been repeatedly held that in the absence of such certificate the facts are not brought before the court at general term for review, much less before this court on appeal from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Halpin v. . Phenix Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Aldridge v. . AldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Porter v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Hyman v. FriedmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  5. Claflin v. FlackNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snaith v. SmithNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  2. Lindheim v. DuysThe Superior Court of New York City · 1895
  3. Lindheim v. DuysThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
  4. Rosenstein v. FoxNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  5. Winter v. Crosstown Street RailwaySuperior Court of Buffalo · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API